UVU Building

Learning from September 10

Strengthening campus safety.

At Utah Valley University, fostering a safe and supportive learning environment is one of our highest priorities. Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, UVU commissioned an independent external review to examine the university’s planning, preparedness, response, and recovery and identify opportunities to enhance campus safety.

We are sharing the report so our community can understand what the reviewers found, where improvements are needed, and how UVU is moving forward.

Read the full independent review

A commitment to our community

“September 10 will always be part of UVU’s history, but it will not define our future. Our responsibility is to care for our community, learn from the findings of this review, and follow through on its recommendations. This requires humility, an honest examination of our policies and practices, and a commitment to act on what we learn.

While we’ve made meaningful progress in strengthening campus safety over the past year, this review provides additional recommendations that will continue to guide our work as we move forward with care, civility, and resilience.”

— UVU President Jon Anderson

What the review found

The independent external review identified a foundation of campus safety policies, personnel, and resources, along with inconsistencies in how those capabilities were put into practice before and during the September 10 event. It also recognized the strength of the response by public safety partners and meaningful steps UVU has taken since the tragedy.

The review also documented the planning and coordination leading up to September 10, including the following:

The event originated with a July 2025 request from UVU’s TPUSA student chapter for Charlie Kirk to speak in the fountain courtyard. In an August 21 questionnaire response, TPUSA projected approximately 600 attendees and reported no security concerns. At an August 25 planning meeting, UVU participants raised concerns about the outdoor location, anticipated attendance, protest activity, crowd management, and access control, and suggested alternative venues. TPUSA requested that the event remain in the courtyard and preferred to manage its own ticketing. The university’s committee allowed those arrangements. During subsequent security coordination, ticket totals were not available, and thus UVU’s police chief was unable to obtain crowd estimates through TPUSA’s ticketing process.

The report’s timeline also documents communication between UVUPD and TPUSA began on September 3. Then on September 8, TPUSA’s security team raised a concern about access to the elevated Hall of Flags outdoor pedestrian walkway above the area where Kirk would speak and requested access controls. On the morning of September 10, TPUSA’s security team again raised concerns about people on the walkway. Chief Long responded that officers would arrive by 11:00 a.m. to address the request. UVUPD officers cleared the area by directing people away from the area directly above the speaking location and blocked it off with police tape. The UVUPD Chief of Police proposed meeting with TPUSA’s security at 11:00 a.m. on the walkway above the canopy where Charlie Kirk would speak, but this meeting did not occur. A detailed timeline and verbatim text exchanges are included in the full report.

Beyond documenting the sequence of events, the review examined UVU’s planning, preparedness, response, and recovery and identified key findings.

“It is the opinion of the Project Team, based on our review of all available information, that at no time during the events leading up to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, or in its aftermath, did any employee or agent of UVU act in bad faith or in willful and wanton disregard for the safety of others.”

— After-Action Report for Utah Valley University

The summaries below introduce 10 key findings, while the full report provides the supporting analysis and recommendations.

1
Put established policies into consistent practice
UVU had a strong foundation of safety policies and procedures, but implementation was inconsistent before and during the events of September 10, 2025. The review calls for stronger documentation, clearer responsibilities, and more consistent execution.
2

Formalize security planning for high-profile events
While a UVU committee and a TPUSA field representative engaged in a planning meeting, the September 10 event lacked a comprehensive written security assessment or event action plan.

The review recommends a more structured planning framework that addresses venue selection, attendance, staffing, access, communications, and emergency response before key event decisions are finalized.

3

Strengthen protective planning and coordination for outdoor venues
Planning for the event did not formalize assessments of elevated vantage points, building access, and other site-specific security concerns. The review calls for documented assessments and earlier, more structured coordination with private security teams and law enforcement partners for major events.

Both TPUSA security and UVUPD failed to ensure a joint pre-event briefing and security walk-through occurred. Reviewers found this was a critical missed opportunity to identify security concerns, clarify responsibilities, and coordinate protective measures.

4
Clarify emergency leadership and communications
The incident response revealed confusion about emergency operations leadership, authority to issue alerts, and protective instructions. The review recommends establishing clear responsibilities, plain-language terminology, and realistic exercises to strengthen emergency coordination and communication.
5
Connect security technology to real-time operations
Existing security systems and cameras provided valuable investigative information after the shooting but were less effectively used for real-time awareness. The review recommends clearer monitoring responsibilities and better integration of technology into event security and emergency response.
6
Build more focused threat investigation capabilities
UVU’s existing monitoring and information-sharing resources did not fully meet the need for focused investigations of specific threats or concerning behavior. The review recommends formal procedures, trained personnel, and appropriate legal and privacy safeguards.
7
Formalize coordination with public safety partners
External agencies responded quickly and professionally, and their strong relationships with UVU contributed to an effective and coordinated response. The review recommends formalizing mutual aid arrangements and integrating outside resources earlier into event planning and preparedness.
8
Align safety leadership, staffing, and training with university needs
UVU should evaluate public safety leadership, staffing, compensation, and training against UVU’s size and responsibilities, including establishing a senior campus safety leadership role with responsibility for all public safety operations, including emergency management.
9
Sustain recovery efforts and strengthen first responder support
UVU took meaningful action in community support, safety awareness, and preparedness after September 10. The review recommends establishing more structured support for first responders and continuing to track, test, and evaluate improvements in campus support, safety awareness, and preparedness to ensure sustained progress.
10
Participate actively in statewide campus safety efforts
Emerging statewide initiatives offer opportunities to strengthen information sharing, training, and coordinated planning. The review recommends that UVU actively participate and incorporate those resources into its safety operations.

Actions taken and work ahead.

Since September 10, 2025, UVU has taken proactive steps to learn from events surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The reviewers recognized meaningful progress in community support, crisis communication planning, emergency preparedness, notification practices, and coordination with public safety partners.

“UVU’s post-incident efforts reflect meaningful progress in several areas.”

— After-Action Report for Utah Valley University

The reviewers examined not only the planning and response leading up to and on September 10, but also UVU’s broader event planning, safety, and security processes. As a result, some recommendations in the review reflect practices that UVU had already implemented before September 10 or had already begun enhancing. These recommendations were included to reinforce the importance of continuing those efforts and maintaining strong event planning and security practices.

UVU has already implemented, is currently implementing, or is actively working toward many of the review’s recommendations. The following recommendations are areas in which UVU had already taken action, has since taken action, or is in the process of taking action:

Action Items Completed or Underway for Organizational Alignment, Staffing, Training and Professional Standards

  • Update campus safety leadership and reporting structures to give the Chief of Police greater access to senior university leaders.
  • Create a Chief Public Safety Officer position to strengthen coordination across campus police, emergency management, fire safety, and campus and event security.
  • Review campus police staffing and pay to ensure resources match the university’s size, daily safety needs, and major-event security demands.
  • Continue to ensure public safety leadership are regularly involved in university planning for major events, emergency preparedness, facilities use, communications, and student activities.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Event Planning, Response, and Interagency Coordination

  • Require documented security assessments and university review for major campus events to identify safety needs and guide event planning.
  • Clarify event planning procedures and who makes key safety decisions, including venue selection, staffing, ticketing, entry requirements, and security screening.
  • Develop clear safety criteria for when events should move indoors or to a more secure location, while respecting free expression and public access requirements.
  • Require written records of major-event reviews, including venue decisions, organizer responsibilities, legal considerations, unresolved safety concerns, resource needs, and leadership approvals.
  • Clarify responsibilities for UVU and outside organizers when they jointly host campus events.
  • Include legal counsel in event security decisions to ensure safety measures respect individual rights and university policies.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Event Security Planning and Security Assessment

  • Require written security assessments for major events, including high-profile speakers, large gatherings, and outdoor events with heightened safety concerns.
  • Incorporate location, speaker, attendance, and potential security concerns into event safety assessments, informed by law enforcement information, relevant public online activity, and lessons from similar events.
  • Use security assessments to guide event locations, staffing, entry procedures, and safety measures, including emergency response, medical support, communications, and coordination with outside agencies.
  • Document key event planning decisions and approvals, including safety measures considered, alternatives ruled out, unresolved concerns, and resource limitations.
  • Develop clear criteria for when additional event security measures are needed based on identified safety concerns.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Event Security Operations

  • Establish a process for written Event Action Plans for high-profile or higher-risk events, using security assessments to define staffing, leadership roles, security duties, communications, and emergency response.
  • Establish an ongoing process to keep primary and backup emergency personnel assignments current, ensuring key response and leadership roles are clearly assigned.
  • Require advance briefings, site walk-throughs, and day-of coordination for events with written Event Action Plans, bringing together campus police, event organizers, emergency management, law enforcement partners, and private security teams.
  • Assign responsibility for monitoring security cameras and communications in real time during high-profile, outdoor, or higher-risk events to help identify and respond to emerging safety concerns.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Access Control, Screening and Credentialing

  • Develop entry and identification plans tailored to major and higher-risk events to clarify who can access event spaces and restricted areas.
  • Require UVU-controlled ticketing for major events when attendance estimates affect safety planning, including venue selection, staffing, entry procedures, and emergency communications.
  • Require event organizers using other ticketing systems to provide updated attendance estimates and real-time access to ticketing data to support event safety planning.
  • Establish written policies on items allowed and prohibited at campus events, consistent with applicable law.
  • Develop written security screening procedures for events where screening is legally permitted and appropriate for the event’s safety needs.
  • Train screening and event security staff on prohibited items, equipment use, disability accommodations, responding to security concerns, recordkeeping, and Utah firearms laws.
  • Evaluate security screening technology based on event safety needs, legal and privacy requirements, available staffing, and accuracy.
  • Develop written duties for event security personnel, covering entry checks, security screening, restricted areas, patrols, crowd management, and emergency response.
  • Identify key locations before major outdoor events, including restricted areas, elevated vantage points, building entrances, security command locations, media and VIP areas, and emergency response routes.
  • Prepare clear information for event attendees on entry procedures, security screening, prohibited items, bag restrictions, and applicable firearms requirements.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Communications and Mass Notification

  • Designate a communications lead and backup for major emergencies to coordinate timely public information when the primary lead is unavailable.
  • Clarify who can draft, approve, issue, update, correct, and withdraw emergency messages, including backup approval procedures and coordination when working remotely.
  • Standardize emergency instructions across safety plans, alerts, training, and public guidance so the campus community receives consistent, clear directions on how to respond.
  • Develop and test pre-approved emergency messages and establish regular updates to provide clear, consistent instructions for common emergencies and all-clear notifications.
  • Review and streamline campus emergency notification systems to make alerts easier to activate and share through text messages, public announcements, computer alerts, and digital signs.
  • Establish emergency communications testing at the start of each semester to check alert delivery, public announcements, radios, backup systems, contact information, and all-clear procedures.
  • Strengthen coordination among campus security and emergency communication systems so entry controls, cameras, alarms, public announcements, digital signs, radios, and emergency alerts work together and support communication with local responders.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Implementation of the Emergency Operations Plan and Active Assailant Protocols

  • Develop practical emergency response guides, staffing checklists, and role instructions, including backup assignments for key leadership and coordination positions.
  • Clarify when to activate the university’s emergency response plan and mobilize emergency operations, senior leadership, and crisis communications teams.
  • Integrate procedures for responding to an active attacker into training, practice exercises, event planning, and emergency message templates.
  • Provide recurring emergency safety training for students, employees, and event staff, covering active assailant response, lockdowns, evacuation, sheltering, and reporting emergencies.
  • Adopt plain language in safety education and emergency messages to help students, employees, and visitors understand what actions to take.

Action Items Completed or Underway for EOC Activation, Situational Awareness and Decision Support

  • Align emergency response and communication plans and establish regular updates to keep leadership roles, backup responsibilities, and message approval procedures consistent.
  • Clarify who can approve emergency messages when designated leaders are unavailable or unable to respond promptly.
  • Assign a campus police representative or law enforcement liaison to the emergency operations center during major incidents to share timely information, coordinate response efforts, and support decisions.
  • Conduct recurring exercises for emergency operations and senior leadership teams to practice sharing information, making decisions, approving public alerts, coordinating resources, and transferring leadership responsibilities.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Interagency Coordination and Mutual Aid Implementation

  • Complete a mutual aid agreement with Orem Police Department and develop or update agreements with nearby public safety agencies to coordinate police, fire, medical, and emergency management support.
  • Expand campus police participation in statewide public safety coordination to strengthen information sharing and collaboration with state agencies and other universities.
  • Conduct joint emergency response exercises with local and state public safety partners to strengthen coordination among police, fire, medical, and emergency management teams.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Application of ICS and Event Action Planning

  • Develop a standard Event Action Plan template that can be adapted to the size and security needs of major and higher-risk events.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Information Sharing and Protective Intelligence

  • Continue working with Utah’s Statewide Information and Analysis Center to assess potential threats before events, report suspicious activity, and share information after incidents.
  • Evaluate services to help protect university leaders and others in higher-risk roles by identifying and reducing personal information publicly available online.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Behavioral Threat Assessment and Threat Management

  • Formally adopt policies and procedures for the university’s behavior assessment team and establish an annual review to keep its guidance current.
  • Continue annual training and professional development for the university’s behavioral assessment team, including broader participation in organizations that help professionals assess and respond to potential threats.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Post-Incident Recovery, Corrective Actions and Preparedness Enhancements

  • Continue to conduct formal reviews after major incidents, events, and emergency exercises to identify needed changes, assign responsibility and deadlines, track progress, and verify that changes work.
  • Establish a structured support program for first responders and employees directly involved in major incidents, including peer support, confidential mental health resources, time to recover, and supervisor follow-up.
  • Finalize the crisis communications plan and align it with emergency response procedures, public alerts, event planning, media communications, and senior leadership decisions.
  • Continue expanding campus safety education and outreach through printed guides, website and app resources, campus information tables, employee training, and student preparedness programs.

Action Items Completed or Underway for Legal Considerations

  • Review university event policies with legal counsel to ensure they remain consistent with free speech and firearms rights, Utah law, and evolving event management practices.
  • Establish clear, objective rules for security fees at campus speaking events that apply consistently regardless of a speaker’s views or message and limit case-by-case discretion.
  • Continue reviewing and updating campus safety warning and emergency alert procedures to meet federal campus safety requirements and reflect evolving practices.
  • Regularly review campus safety, emergency management, and event planning procedures with legal counsel to ensure they remain consistent with applicable laws and regulations.

Our commitment does not end with the release of this report. We will continue to communicate progress as recommendations are evaluated and implemented and use training and exercises to assess how these changes work in practice.

About the independent review

The review was conducted by a consortium of independent experts from Robert L. Davis LLC, Doherty Advisory LLC, The Lake Forest Group, and Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP. The project team performed site visits, conducted more than 70 interviews and examined thousands of pages of university policies, training materials, operational records, digital evidence, and dispatch and communication records.

The project team combined legal, operational, and investigative expertise in law enforcement, campus safety, physical security, executive protection, emergency preparedness, threat assessment, and crisis communications. The findings and recommendations are those of the independent project team.

Read the full independent review